Improving students' creative thinking in biology learning through Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom
Keywords:
Creative thinking, flipped classroom, Remap-TPS
Abstract
Implementing the Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom has not yet been carried out to improve creative thinking skills in biology learning. This study aims to determine the effect of the Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom model on students' creative thinking skills in biology learning. This study is a mixed method. The research design used was a pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. The research sample comprised 72 class X students at SMAN 9 Malang, East Java, Indonesia. They were divided into one experimental class and one control class. The Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom was taught in the experimental class, while the TPS model was taught in the control class. Quantitative data was collected through pretest and posttest using essay question that refer to creative thinking indicators: curiosity, fluency, originality, elaboration, flexibility, divergent, messiness/risk taking and with others. This essay's questions have previously been tested to show valid and reliable results because Cronbach's alpha value is 0.778. Qualitative data is used together with quantitative data from the results of student answers. Analysis was carried out using the ANCOVA test with a significance level of 5%, then continued with the LSD test. Data is also explained qualitatively from the results of student answers. The study results show that the Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom model affects students' creative thinking skills. This is proven by a significance value of 0.00<0.05. Therefore, the Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom can be used as an alternative learning model to improve students' creative thinking in biology learning. Implementing the Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom requires adapting learning instruments and tools to the learning model used and the skills measured to improve learning activities, especially in improving students' creative thinking skills.
References
Afifah, N., Saidun Anwar, M., Hakim Muslim, A., & Eka Juarlan, A. (2023). Balban: Students’ creative thinking ability on think pair share learning model assisted balban (comparison blocks). AMCA Journal Of Science And Technology, 2(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.51773/ajst.v2i2/252
Ahmad, K., Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, M., & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-based learning strategy: its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1141
Aljaafil, E. (2019). Turquoise international journal of educational research and social studies critical thinking skills for primary edu. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED598279
Annamalai, S., & Muniandy, B. (2013). Reading habit and attitude among malaysian polytechnic students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 32–41. www.iojes.net
Antika, L. T. (2018). The relationship between metacognition skills with the student’s achievement: The implementation of reading-concept map-think pair share (remap-tps) model. Jurnal Pena Sains, 5(1). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org
Asmara, R., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sari, N. (2023). Levels of inquiry and reading-questioning-answering (loirqa) to enhance high school students’ critical and creative thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16318a
Atwa, Z., Sulayeh, Y., Abdelhadi, A., Jazar, H. A., & Eriqat, S. (2022). Flipped classroom effects on grade 9 students’ critical thinking skills, psychological stress, and academic achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15240a
Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791
Berestova, A., Ermakov, D., Aitbayeva, A., Gromov, E., & Vanina, E. (2021). Retracted: Social networks to improve the creative thinking of students: How does it works? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100912
Chang, Y.-Y., & Shih, H.-Y. (2019). Work curiosity: A new lens for understanding employee creativity. Human Resource Management Review, 29(4), 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.10.005
Creely, E., Henderson, M., Henriksen, D., & Crawford, R. (2021). Leading change for creativity in schools: mobilizing creative risk-taking and productive failure. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1969040
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
Elisondo, R. (2016). Creativity is always a social process. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 3(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0013
Ersoy, E., & Başer, N. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning method in higher education on creative thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3494–3498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.790
Florida, R., & King, K. (2015). The global creativity index 2015 cities. https://www.martinproperity.org/
Gaughan, J. E. (2014). The flipped classroom in world history. The History Teacher, 47(2), 221-244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43264225
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.94
Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills-a guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Sage Publications. https://readingbooks.host/?book=1452218013
Hines, M. E., Catalana, S. M., & Anderson, B. N. (2019). When learning sinks in: Using the incubation model of teaching to guide students through the creative thinking process. Gifted Child Today, 42(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518804858
Huang, S.-Y., Kuo, Y.-H., & Chen, H.-C. (2020). Applying digital escape rooms infused with science teaching in elementary school: Learning performance, learning motivation, and problem-solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100681
Ilham, M. A., Zubaidah, S., & Ghofur Candra Wicaksono, A. (2023). Effects of remap-tps using wizer.me website and mindmap application on students’ cognitive learning results. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., Sulisetijono, & Astriani, M. (2021). Does remap-stad have the potential to promote students’ creative thinking skills? 030029. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043179
Jatmiko, A., Kartina, Y., Irwandani, I., Fakhri, J., Pricilia, A., & Rahayu, T. (2018). Reading concept map-think pair share (remap-tps) learning model on cognitive ability and scientific attitude. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3184
Jia, X., Li, W., & Cao, L. (2019). The Role of Metacognitive components in creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2014). The effect of instructional techniques on critical thinking and critical thinking dispositions in online discussion. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280942771
Katz, D. S., McInnes, L. C., Bernholdt, D. E., Mayes, A. C., Hong, N. P. C., Duckles, J., Gesing, S., Heroux, M. A., Hettrick, S., Jimenez, R. C., Pierce, M., Weaver, B., & Wilkins-Diehr, N. (2019). Community organizations: Changing the culture in which research software is developed and sustained. Computing in Science & Engineering, 21(2), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2018.2883051
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
Kirana, C., & Cahyowati, E. T. D. (2020). An implementation of open-ended approach with tps (think pair share) to improve creative thinking skills for student of class vii-b of sMP Negeri 9 Malang. 060013. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000767
Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
Lee, S., & Carpenter, R. (2015). Creative thinking for 21st century composing practices: creativity pedagogies across disciplines. Across the Disciplines, 12(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2015.12.4.12
Leedy, P. D., Ormrod, J. E., & Johnson, L. R. (2021). Practical research: Planning and design.United States of America: Pearson Education. https://ebin.pub/practical-research-12th-edition-12nbsped-9780134775654-1292339241-9781292339245-9781292339283.html
Linsenmeyer, M. (2021). Brief activities: Questioning, brainstorming, think-pair-share, jigsaw, and clinical case discussions. How-to Guide for Active Learning, 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62916-8_5
Lucas, B. J., & Nordgren, L. F. (2015). People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000030
Lucchiari, C., Sala, P. M., & Vanutelli, M. E. (2019). The effects of a cognitive pathway to promote class creative thinking. An experimental study on Italian primary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.002
Madyani, I., Yamtinah, S., Utomo, S. B., Saputro, S., & Mahardiani, L. (2020). Profile of students’ creative thinking skills in science learning. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.119
Marron, T. R., & Faust, M. (n.d.). Free association, divergent thinking, and creativity: Cognitive and neural perspectives. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity, 261–280. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.016
Mayseless, N., Eran, A., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2015). Generating original ideas: The neural underpinning of originality. NeuroImage, 116, 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.030
Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Schatschneider, C., Steacy, L. M., Terry, N. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st‐century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352
Raba, A. A. A. (2017). The influence of think-pair-share (tps) on improving students’ oral communication skills in efl classrooms. Creative Education, 08(01), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.81002
Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
Sadeq A, Z., Binti, N., Ngadiran, M., Kadir, Z. A., Ali, W., Altowayti, H., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2021). Reading habits and attitudes among university students: A review. JOURNAL OF TECHNO SOCIAL, 13(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.30880/jts.2021.13.01.006
Scheffer, M., Baas, M., & Bjordam, T. K. (2017). Teaching originality? Common habits behind creative production in science and arts. Ecology and Society, 22(2), art29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09258-220229
Segundo M, R. I., López Fernández, V., Daza González, M. T., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663
Setiawan, D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). Minat baca dan keterampilan metakognitif pada pembelajaran biologi melalui model pembelajaran remap think pair share. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 5(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.651
Sharma, H. L., & Saarsar, P. (2018). TPS (Think-Pair-Share): An effective cooperative learning strategy for unleashing discussion in classroom interaction. http://www.ijmra.us
Sheu, F.-R., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Taking a signal: A review of gesture-based computing research in education. Computers & Education, 78, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.008
Sihaloho, R. R., Sahyar, S., & Ginting, E. M. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (pbl) model toward student’s creative thinking and problem solving ability in senior high school. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(04), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704011118
Silva, H., Lopes, J., Dominguez, C., & Morais, E. (2022). Lecture, cooperative learning and concept mapping: Any differences on critical and creative thinking development. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15144a
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056
Sugiyanto, F. N., Masykuri, M., & Muzzazinah. (2018). Analysis of senior high school students’ creative thinking skills profile in Klaten regency. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012038
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
Sur, E., & Ates, M. (2022). Examination of the relationship between creative thinking skills and comprehension skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.42.9.2
Tendrita, M., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2016). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif melalui Model Remap Think Pair Share. Seminar Nasional XIII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 13(1), 285-291. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5722
Tendrita, M., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Pembelajaran reading-concept-map think pair share (remap-tps) dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan, 2(6). https://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/9332
Trisnayanti, Y., Ashadi, Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2020). Creative thinking profile of junior high school students on learning science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1), 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012072
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Hsu, P. S. (2013). Using creative problem solving to promote students’ performance of concept mapping. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9230-8
Tytenko, S. V. (2021). Concept maps, their application types and methods in information and learning systems. KPI Science News, 4. https://doi.org/10.20535/kpisn.2020.4.227090
Wu, T.-T., & Wu, Y.-T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
Yang, X. (2022). Constructivism‐based drama activities in reading classes. TESOL Journal, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.681
Zabelina, D. L., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016). Dynamic network interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.014
Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom on students’ learning achievement and learning motivation: A meta-analysis. In Educational Technology & Society (Vol. 23, Issue 1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915403
Zubaidah, S. (2014). The empowerment of discovery skills in scientific approach through remap coople based learning. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 11(1), 1000-111. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/7970
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through Differentiated Science Inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10214a
Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Ramadhan, F., Tendrita, M., & Ismirawati, N. (2018). Empowering critical and creative thinking skills through remap stad learning model. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology, 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206129.3239435
Ahmad, K., Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, M., & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-based learning strategy: its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1141
Aljaafil, E. (2019). Turquoise international journal of educational research and social studies critical thinking skills for primary edu. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED598279
Annamalai, S., & Muniandy, B. (2013). Reading habit and attitude among malaysian polytechnic students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 32–41. www.iojes.net
Antika, L. T. (2018). The relationship between metacognition skills with the student’s achievement: The implementation of reading-concept map-think pair share (remap-tps) model. Jurnal Pena Sains, 5(1). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org
Asmara, R., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sari, N. (2023). Levels of inquiry and reading-questioning-answering (loirqa) to enhance high school students’ critical and creative thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16318a
Atwa, Z., Sulayeh, Y., Abdelhadi, A., Jazar, H. A., & Eriqat, S. (2022). Flipped classroom effects on grade 9 students’ critical thinking skills, psychological stress, and academic achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15240a
Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791
Berestova, A., Ermakov, D., Aitbayeva, A., Gromov, E., & Vanina, E. (2021). Retracted: Social networks to improve the creative thinking of students: How does it works? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100912
Chang, Y.-Y., & Shih, H.-Y. (2019). Work curiosity: A new lens for understanding employee creativity. Human Resource Management Review, 29(4), 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.10.005
Creely, E., Henderson, M., Henriksen, D., & Crawford, R. (2021). Leading change for creativity in schools: mobilizing creative risk-taking and productive failure. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1969040
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
Elisondo, R. (2016). Creativity is always a social process. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 3(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0013
Ersoy, E., & Başer, N. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning method in higher education on creative thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3494–3498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.790
Florida, R., & King, K. (2015). The global creativity index 2015 cities. https://www.martinproperity.org/
Gaughan, J. E. (2014). The flipped classroom in world history. The History Teacher, 47(2), 221-244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43264225
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.94
Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills-a guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Sage Publications. https://readingbooks.host/?book=1452218013
Hines, M. E., Catalana, S. M., & Anderson, B. N. (2019). When learning sinks in: Using the incubation model of teaching to guide students through the creative thinking process. Gifted Child Today, 42(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518804858
Huang, S.-Y., Kuo, Y.-H., & Chen, H.-C. (2020). Applying digital escape rooms infused with science teaching in elementary school: Learning performance, learning motivation, and problem-solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100681
Ilham, M. A., Zubaidah, S., & Ghofur Candra Wicaksono, A. (2023). Effects of remap-tps using wizer.me website and mindmap application on students’ cognitive learning results. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., Sulisetijono, & Astriani, M. (2021). Does remap-stad have the potential to promote students’ creative thinking skills? 030029. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043179
Jatmiko, A., Kartina, Y., Irwandani, I., Fakhri, J., Pricilia, A., & Rahayu, T. (2018). Reading concept map-think pair share (remap-tps) learning model on cognitive ability and scientific attitude. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3184
Jia, X., Li, W., & Cao, L. (2019). The Role of Metacognitive components in creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2014). The effect of instructional techniques on critical thinking and critical thinking dispositions in online discussion. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280942771
Katz, D. S., McInnes, L. C., Bernholdt, D. E., Mayes, A. C., Hong, N. P. C., Duckles, J., Gesing, S., Heroux, M. A., Hettrick, S., Jimenez, R. C., Pierce, M., Weaver, B., & Wilkins-Diehr, N. (2019). Community organizations: Changing the culture in which research software is developed and sustained. Computing in Science & Engineering, 21(2), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2018.2883051
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
Kirana, C., & Cahyowati, E. T. D. (2020). An implementation of open-ended approach with tps (think pair share) to improve creative thinking skills for student of class vii-b of sMP Negeri 9 Malang. 060013. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000767
Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
Lee, S., & Carpenter, R. (2015). Creative thinking for 21st century composing practices: creativity pedagogies across disciplines. Across the Disciplines, 12(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2015.12.4.12
Leedy, P. D., Ormrod, J. E., & Johnson, L. R. (2021). Practical research: Planning and design.United States of America: Pearson Education. https://ebin.pub/practical-research-12th-edition-12nbsped-9780134775654-1292339241-9781292339245-9781292339283.html
Linsenmeyer, M. (2021). Brief activities: Questioning, brainstorming, think-pair-share, jigsaw, and clinical case discussions. How-to Guide for Active Learning, 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62916-8_5
Lucas, B. J., & Nordgren, L. F. (2015). People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000030
Lucchiari, C., Sala, P. M., & Vanutelli, M. E. (2019). The effects of a cognitive pathway to promote class creative thinking. An experimental study on Italian primary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.002
Madyani, I., Yamtinah, S., Utomo, S. B., Saputro, S., & Mahardiani, L. (2020). Profile of students’ creative thinking skills in science learning. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.119
Marron, T. R., & Faust, M. (n.d.). Free association, divergent thinking, and creativity: Cognitive and neural perspectives. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity, 261–280. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.016
Mayseless, N., Eran, A., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2015). Generating original ideas: The neural underpinning of originality. NeuroImage, 116, 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.030
Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Schatschneider, C., Steacy, L. M., Terry, N. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st‐century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352
Raba, A. A. A. (2017). The influence of think-pair-share (tps) on improving students’ oral communication skills in efl classrooms. Creative Education, 08(01), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.81002
Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
Sadeq A, Z., Binti, N., Ngadiran, M., Kadir, Z. A., Ali, W., Altowayti, H., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2021). Reading habits and attitudes among university students: A review. JOURNAL OF TECHNO SOCIAL, 13(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.30880/jts.2021.13.01.006
Scheffer, M., Baas, M., & Bjordam, T. K. (2017). Teaching originality? Common habits behind creative production in science and arts. Ecology and Society, 22(2), art29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09258-220229
Segundo M, R. I., López Fernández, V., Daza González, M. T., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663
Setiawan, D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). Minat baca dan keterampilan metakognitif pada pembelajaran biologi melalui model pembelajaran remap think pair share. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 5(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.651
Sharma, H. L., & Saarsar, P. (2018). TPS (Think-Pair-Share): An effective cooperative learning strategy for unleashing discussion in classroom interaction. http://www.ijmra.us
Sheu, F.-R., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Taking a signal: A review of gesture-based computing research in education. Computers & Education, 78, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.008
Sihaloho, R. R., Sahyar, S., & Ginting, E. M. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (pbl) model toward student’s creative thinking and problem solving ability in senior high school. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(04), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704011118
Silva, H., Lopes, J., Dominguez, C., & Morais, E. (2022). Lecture, cooperative learning and concept mapping: Any differences on critical and creative thinking development. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15144a
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056
Sugiyanto, F. N., Masykuri, M., & Muzzazinah. (2018). Analysis of senior high school students’ creative thinking skills profile in Klaten regency. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012038
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
Sur, E., & Ates, M. (2022). Examination of the relationship between creative thinking skills and comprehension skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.42.9.2
Tendrita, M., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2016). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif melalui Model Remap Think Pair Share. Seminar Nasional XIII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 13(1), 285-291. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5722
Tendrita, M., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Pembelajaran reading-concept-map think pair share (remap-tps) dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan, 2(6). https://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/9332
Trisnayanti, Y., Ashadi, Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2020). Creative thinking profile of junior high school students on learning science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1), 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012072
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Hsu, P. S. (2013). Using creative problem solving to promote students’ performance of concept mapping. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9230-8
Tytenko, S. V. (2021). Concept maps, their application types and methods in information and learning systems. KPI Science News, 4. https://doi.org/10.20535/kpisn.2020.4.227090
Wu, T.-T., & Wu, Y.-T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
Yang, X. (2022). Constructivism‐based drama activities in reading classes. TESOL Journal, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.681
Zabelina, D. L., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016). Dynamic network interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.014
Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom on students’ learning achievement and learning motivation: A meta-analysis. In Educational Technology & Society (Vol. 23, Issue 1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915403
Zubaidah, S. (2014). The empowerment of discovery skills in scientific approach through remap coople based learning. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 11(1), 1000-111. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/7970
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through Differentiated Science Inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10214a
Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Ramadhan, F., Tendrita, M., & Ismirawati, N. (2018). Empowering critical and creative thinking skills through remap stad learning model. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology, 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206129.3239435
Published
2024-02-05
How to Cite
Ramdhani, S. A., Zubaidah, S., & Prabaningtyas, S. (2024). Improving students’ creative thinking in biology learning through Remap-TPS integrated flipped classroom. Edubiotik : Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 9(01), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.33503/ebio.v9i01.3873
Section
Articles
.png)
2.png)
1.jpg)
