An Analysis of Amber Heard's Statements in the Johnny Depp Defamation Case
A Forensic Linguistics Study
Abstract
A defamatory act is any act of speech that disparages the reputation of a person. Defamation is committed by conveying speech in the form of a series of words or sentences by accusing a person of certain actions, which are aimed at honor and good name so that it can result in the person's dignity or dignity being humiliated or degraded. This research aims to examine Amber Heard's statements for defaming Johnny Depp. The data analyzed are Amber Heard's several statements that indicates false and defamatory (primary data) and also her testimony during the trial as supporting data (secondary data). The primary data was collected and observed through the articles op-ed which written by Amber Heard in Washington Post and the secondary data was collected through the trial transcript. This study uses a qualitative research method that describes data to determine the elements that can defame a person based on forensic linguistic studies. By using this study, the data that has been selected was analyzed using lexical semantics, pragmatics (speech acts), and linked to legislation based on Virginia Law. The researchers found three statements that proved to be defamatory and acted with obvious malice that have damaged Johnny Depp's reputation. The findings of this study have significant implications, showing that defamatory statements can have a profound and lasting impact on an individual's reputation and public perception, emphasizing the importance of the law in protecting and addressing such acts.
References
Abusive and Insulting Language, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-416 (1975). https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter9/section18.2-416/
Amber Heard. (2018). Amber Heard: I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ive-seen-how-institutions-protect-men-accused-of-abuse-heres-what-we-can-do/2018/12/18/71fd876a-02ed-11e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html
Antara, I. G. N. (2023). A Case of Defamation: Linguistic Forensics Study. The International Journal of Social Sciences World , 5(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7633982
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. In How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Burhanuddin, F. (2022). ANALISIS LINGUISTIK FORENSIK PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL= FORENSIC LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF DEFAMATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA [Doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Hassanudin.
Defamation, Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-45 (1977). https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title8.01/chapter3/section8.01-45/
Defamation, Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-46 (1977). https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title8.01/chapter3/section8.01-46/
Depp Dive - Transcripts of US Trial Days. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://deppdive.net/us_daily_ff.html
Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistics Semantics. Routledge.
Halid, R. (2022). Tindak tutur pelaku pecemaran nama baik di media sosial kajian linguistik forensik. Kredo: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(2), 441–458.
Kearns, K. (2011). Semantics (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
McMenamin, G. R. (2002). Forensic Linguistics: Advances in Forensic Stylistics. CRC Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Nasution, H. (2020). Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam Perspektif Linguistik Forensik. Kelasa, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.26499/kelasa.v14i1.77
Simanjuntak, V. H. M. (2022). CONTEXTUALIZING SPEECH ACTS PERFORMED BY SUNDAY SCHOOL CHILDREN AT ST. FRANSISKUS ASSISI CHURCH MEDAN. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5(1), 10–17. http://ejurnal.budiutomomalang.ac.id/index.php/journey
Olsson, J. (2008). Forensic Linguistics: Second Edition: An Introduction To Language, Crime and the Law. Bloomsbury Academic.
Pratiwi, A., Cahya, F., & Silitonga, L. (2024). Tindak Tutur Pelaku Pencemaran Nama Baik Luhut Binsar Panjaitan Oleh Haris Azhar Dan Fatia Maulidiyanti Dalam Konten Sosial Media Youtube ‘Ada Lord Luhut Dibalik Relasi Ekonomi-Ops Militer Intan Jaya.’ Jurnal Nakula: Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(1), 80–89.
Rahmat, W. (2017). Linguistik Forensik, Alat Analisis Kejahatan Berbahasa. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/3hbkp
Rolph, D. (2008). Reputation, Celebrity and Defamation Law. Ashgate Publishing.
Searle, J. R. (1968). Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts. The Philosophical Review, 77(4), 405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183008
Searle, J. R. (1979). EXPRESSION AND MEANING Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Sexual Violence. (2022). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/violence-info/sexual-violence/
Shuy, R. W. (2010). The Language of Defamation Cases. Oxford University Press.
Subyantoro, S. (2019). Linguistik forensik: Sumbangsih kajian bahasa dalam penegakan hukum. ADIL Indonesia Journal, 1(1).
Susanthi, I. (2021). Analisis Pencemaran Nama Baik Dengan Kajian Linguistik Forensik. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistic, 2(1), 1–3. https://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/ijfl/article/view/4067
Copyright (c) 2024 Gizela Intania Maylida, Khristianto Khristianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy by http://ejurnal.budiutomomalang.ac.id/index.php/journey/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
