Correlation Analysis Between Practicality and Effectiveness of Physical Education Curriculum in Senior High School

  • Rista Aden Irawan SMK PEMUDA 3 KESAMBEN
  • Susilo Bekti IKIP Budi Utomo
  • Ahmad Lani IKIP Budi Utomo
Keywords: Analysis, Practicality, Effectiveness, Curriculum


In education, the curriculum is the most important needs. It becomes a practice guidance for teachers. Moreover, the curriculum was made to be implemented, so that the most important measurement of good curriculum is the practical aspect. This research is classified as quantitative research with statistical correlation analysis. The research data were collected through a questionnaire distributed online in the form of a Google Form application containing curriculum implementation. This research used participants of National Webinar entitled "Physical Education and Sports for Millennials in the New Normal Era". Furthermore, data processing was carried out through the SPSS application and analyzed by means of a single average test (one sample t-test) and correlation. From the results of the correlation test analysis, it was found that the correlation between the practicality value and the effectiveness was 0.776. The limitation of this research was that the researcher only examined the high school curriculum. It did not examine the curriculum in elementary and junior high schools. This research concluded that the curriculum for Physical Education, Sports and Health subjects has met the practicality criteria and effectiveness criteria, and there is a relationship between practicality and curriculum effectiveness. The more practical a curriculum is, the more effective the curriculum will be.


Banville, D., Marttinen, R., Kulinna, P. H., & Ferry, M. (2021). Curriculum decisions made by secondary physical education teachers and comparison with students’ preferences. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 12(3), 199–216.

Casey, A., & MacPhail, A. (2018). Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 294–310.

Coulter, M., Scanlon, D., MacPhail, A., O’Brien, W., Belton, S., & Woods, C. (2020). The (mis)alignment between young people’s collective physical activity experience and physical education curriculum development in Ireland. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 11(3), 204–221.

Davis, S., Zhu, X., & Haegele, J. (2018). Factors influencing high school girls’ enrolment in elective physical education: an exploratory qualitative inquiry. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 9(3), 286–299.

Gray, S., Mitchell, F., Wang, C. K. J., & Robertson, A. (2018). Understanding students’ experiences in a PE, health and well-being context: a self-determination theory perspective. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 9(2), 157–173.

Haugh, M., & Sinkeviciute, V. (2021). The pragmatics of initial interactions: Cross-cultural and intercultural perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 185, 35–39.

Komara, E. (2018). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter dan Pembelajaran Abad 21. SIPATAHOENAN: South-East Asian Journal for Youth, Sports & Health Education, 4(1), 1–10. Retrieved from

Lomotey, B. A., & Csajbok-Twerefou, I. (2021). A pragmatic and sociolinguistic analysis of proverbs across languages and cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 182, 86–91.

Munajim, A., Barnawi, B., & Fikriyah, F. (2020). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pembelajaran di Masa Darurat. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 4(2), 285.

Phillips, S. R., Marttinen, R., Mercier, K., & Gibbone, A. (2021). Middle school students’ perceptions of physical education: A qualitative look. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(1), 30–38.

Purwadhi, P. (2019). Pengembangan Kurikulum dalam Pembelajaran Abad XXI. Mimbar Pendidikan, 4(2), 103–112.

Roure, C., & Pasco, D. (2018). The impact of learning task design on students’ situational interest in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(1), 24–34.

Rumini, R., & Soegiyanto, S. (2021). Implementation of One Sheet Learning Plan in Physics and Health Education Study in Smp Sub Rayon 06 Semarang Academic Year 2020 / 2021. Journal of Physical Education Nad Sport, 10(2), 135–141.

Setiadi, B., Soegiyanto, M., Rahayu, S., & Setijono, H. (2019). Evaluation of the 2013 Curriculum Implemented by Physical Education Teachers.

Susilo, A. H., & Awang, F. (2019). The Implementation Method in Senior High School Physical Sports and Health Education Teacher to The Assessment of Learning Outcomes ( Revision of Curriculum 2013 ) in Pemalang District. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 8(2), 140–146. Retrieved from

Walseth, K., Engebretsen, B., & Elvebakk, L. (2018). Meaningful experiences in PE for all students: an activist research approach. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 235–249.

Wang, J., Shen, B., Luo, X., Hu, Q., & Garn, A. C. (2018). Validation of a teachers’ achievement goal instrument for teaching physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(1), 91–100.

Whittle, R., & MacPhail, A. (2020). The PE school curriculum challenge: The shared construction, implementation and enactment of school physical education curriculum. School Physical Education and Teacher Education: Collaborative Redesign for the 21st Century, 103–115.

How to Cite
Irawan, R., Bekti, S., & Lani, A. (2022). Correlation Analysis Between Practicality and Effectiveness of Physical Education Curriculum in Senior High School. Jp.Jok (Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga Dan Kesehatan), 5(2), 271-281.
Abstract viewed = 557 times
pdf downloaded = 410 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>