MENGUKUR HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STAD (STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION)

Ivanatul Nurizza; Wuli Oktiningrum

doi:10.33503/prismatika.v3i1.1121

Ivanatul Nurizza Universitas Islam Raden Rahmat Malang
Wuli Oktiningrum Universitas Islam Raden Rahmat Malang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33503/prismatika.v3i1.1121

Keywords: learning outcomes, conventional learning models, STAD

Abstract

Implementation of the teaching and learning process in general still use conventional learning models so as to result in low mathematics learning outcomes of students, especially in the surrounding material and flat building area. This study aimed to measure the differences in learning outcomes of class IV students through STAD (Student Teams Achievement Division) learning model and conventional learning. This study used quasi-experimental quantitative research design by looking at the differences in mathematical value results in pre-test and post-test between control class and experimental class. Based on the data analysis, the results of the study showed that there were differences in the learning outcomes of mathematics students of class IV who use the learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and conventional learning. This was evidenced by the average value of the control class which increased by 9.88% from 54.36 to 64.24 while the average value of the class in the experimental class reached 24.92% from 55.80 to 80.72.

References

Aini, M. (2016). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri 1 Gunung Terang Kecamatan Tanjung Karang Barat Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Universitas Lampung.
Depdiknas. (2007). Standar Isi. Jakarta: Permendikbud No. 21 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fuadi, R., Johar, R., & Munzir, S. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan penalaran Matematis Melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual. Jurnal Didaktika, 3(1), 47–54.
Hadi, S. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Papers. Tasikmalaya: Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi.
Hakiim, L. (2010). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima.
Kaprinaputri, A. P. (2013). Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika. JIV, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/jiv.0801.2
Mulyadi, M. (2011). Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Serta Pemikiran Dasar Menggabungkannya. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 15(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2011.150106
National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17957.x
Riadi, E. S. (2016). Studi Komparasi Penggunaan strategi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dan Strategi Konvensional terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2).
Ruseffendi, E. T. (2005). Pengantar kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito.
Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Media.
Syah, M. (2009). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wahyuddin. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Verbal. Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 9(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v9i2.9
Zalima, E. I., Njanji, F. P., Lasmiatik, L., Agustina, L., & Dela, M. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Operasi Hitung pada Bilangan Pecahan Campuran. Prismatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Riset Matematika, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33503/prismatika.v2i2.658