Analisis Kesesuaian Materi dengan Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan pada Matakuliah Desain dan Strategi Pembelajaran

  • Tri Asih Wahyu IKIP Budi Utomo
  • Luthfie Lufthansa Pendidikan Jasmani Kesehatan dan Rekreasi, IKIP Budi Utomo
  • Puspita Pebri Setiani Pendidikan Sejarah dan Sosiologi, IKIP Budi Utomo

Abstract

The ideal curriculum must have a match between learning outcomes and learning methods and teaching materials. The KKNI curriculum at the bachelor's level (S1) level begins with the preparation of profiles of higher education graduates which are then translated into Graduate Learning Outcomes. Based on this, this research was carried out with the aim of analyzing the level of suitability between the learning outcomes of graduates and the teaching materials in the Design and Learning Strategy Subject. This research is a qualitative descriptive study using document analysis method. The data collection instrument is a guidebook for the preparation of the KKNI curriculum, Semester Learning Plans for Design and Learning Strategies, Student Learning Outcomes in Design and Learning Strategy Subjects in the IKIP Budi Utomo Health and Recreation Physical Education Study Program and a rubric for assessment of the suitability of teaching materials. The data obtained were described qualitatively. The results showed that the teaching materials in the Design and Learning Strategy Subjects were in accordance with the learning outcomes of graduates as stated in the IQF with a suitability level of 84% which was in the "very appropriate" category. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the teaching materials arranged in the Learning Design and Strategy course are in accordance with the learning outcomes of graduates in the KKNI curriculum.

Published
2020-11-05
How to Cite
Wahyu, T., Lufthansa, L., & Setiani, P. (2020). Analisis Kesesuaian Materi dengan Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan pada Matakuliah Desain dan Strategi Pembelajaran. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IKIP Budi Utomo, 1(01), 524-528. https://doi.org/10.33503/prosiding.v1i01.1141
Abstract viewed = 1099 times
PDF downloaded = 1368 times