Analisis Instrumen Psychological Well-Being

  • Susilo Bekti Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, IKIP Budi Utomo Malang
  • Mistianah Mistianah IKIP Budi Utomo
  • Tria Muhamad Aris IKIP Budi Utomo
  • Ardian Anjar Pangestuti IKIP Budi Utomo
  • Rohdiatin Artiani Ulla IKIP Budi Utomo
Keywords: Psychological Well-Being, Validitas, Reabilitas, Covid-19

Abstract

Everyone has the right to have a welfare life. Humans are seen as a whole person, who has many aspects within him such as physical, social, intellectual, emotional, spiritual and aesthetic. So the welfare of life is important for everyone to have because the welfare of life is the result of the functioning of the physical and psychological aspects that are running well and optimally in humans. The type of research that will be used in this study is a quantitative descriptive research method. Quantitative descriptive research is research that provides an in-depth description of the current situation. This study aims to describe systematically, factually, and accurately about the facts or characteristics of a population, or want to describe a phenomenon in detail. The term psychological well-being first departed from the views of the philosopher Aristotle regarding the notion of eudaimonism. According to KBBI, a pandemic is defined as an outbreak that spreads simultaneously everywhere, covering a wide geographic area. validity, namely a measuring instrument can be said to be valid if it can measure what is being measured. The concept of reliability is closely related to the repetition or reproducibility of a measuring instrument. a measuring instrument is said to be reliable if it has consistency and produces slightly different results or even the same results when the measuring instrument is used again. Based on the research results, the conclusions obtained are as follows: 1. The Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale has a reliability of 0.885, which means that this measuring instrument has good reliability. 2. There are 5 items on this scale that still have unsatisfactory discriminating power, namely item 42 from the dimension of self-acceptance, item 4 from positive relationships with other people, item 8 and 38 from the dimension of environmental mastery. Item 31 is from the dimension of autonomy, so it needs to be revised.

Keywords: psychological well-being, validity, reliability, and covid-19

Published
2022-12-20
How to Cite
Bekti, S., Mistianah, M., Aris, T., Pangestuti, A., & Ulla, R. (2022). Analisis Instrumen Psychological Well-Being. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IKIP Budi Utomo, 3(01), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.33503/prosiding.v3i01.2460
Abstract viewed = 537 times
PDF downloaded = 1036 times