Hybridity Across Linguistic Studies
This study investigates the hybridity across linguistic studies from 2017 to 2019. It specifically attempts to figure out the trends of hybrid linguistic areas. To have a clear insight into the issue, a qualitative text analysis was adopted as the design of study. As the data sources, 304 research articles in linguistics were successfully retrieved from the digital data bases of internationally reputable linguistic journals. From each year, the newest released articles were purposively selected as the data sources. To have the clear insight into the hybrid areas across linguistic studies, the initial analysis was carried out on the titles of research articles. Further, analysis was also conducted on the abstracts and research questions. Based on the analysis on the titles, abstracts and research questions, it was found that there were 16 types of hybridity across linguistic studies from 2017 to 2019. The two most frequent hybrid linguistic fields in sequence encompass ‘Critical Discourse Analysis + Multimodality’ and ‘Critical Discourse Analysis + Systemic Functional Linguistics’. It is expected that the results of this study contributes to provide the insight into the possibility of mixing different areas of linguistic studies as a way of solving human’s growing complex humanistic problems.
Al Fajri, M. S. (2018). The representation of a blasphemy protest in Jakarta in local and international press. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 705–713.
Astawa, I. G., Budiarsa, M., & Simpen, I. W. (2019). The representation of the Tri Hita Karana Ecosophy in the Awig-awig (customary law) text of Tenganan Pegringsingan Village: Critical ecolinguistics perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 396–401. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.23
Ballard, K. J., N.M., E., Shen, S., Monroe, P., & Tan, C. T. (2019). Feasibility of automatic speech recognition for providing feedback during tablet-based treatment for apraxia of speech plus aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28, 818–834. http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2367/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=c1072b41-994a-4ff5-a949-78b4a1db2522%40sessionmgr4007.%0A%0A
Bavali, M., & Sadighi, F. (2008). Chomsky’s universal grammar and Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics: An appraisal and a compromise. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(121), 11–28.
Catalano, T., & Gatti, L. (2017). Representing teachers as criminals in the news: a multimodal critical discourse analysis of the Atlanta schools’ “Cheating Scandal.” Social Semiotics, 27(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1145386
Choura, S. (2013). Ditransitive complementation in medical research articles. JéTou, 1(1), 53–58.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher Limited.
Emilia, E. (2010). Students’ critical thinking in writing a thesis using the transitivity system. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(2), 101–111. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/2628
Guo, E., & Zhang, D. (2017). Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2017.1282796
Hamdani, B., Luthfiyati, D., Husnulhotimah, H., & Kartika, S. D. (2022). Discourse analysis on selected texts of Bog Bog Bali Cartoon Magazine. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v5i1.1778
He, H. (2019). Past achievements and future possiblities of systemic-functional discourse/text analysis: In memory of M. A. K. Halliday. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.15
Hongwei, J. (2017). Tradition and innovation: Linguistic field research in China. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 13(1), 27–33.
Ignatieva, N. (2008). A systemic functional analysis of college students’ literature essays in Spanish. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication, 29, 420–433.
Kazemian, B., Behnam, B., & Ghafoori, N. (2013). Ideational grammatical metaphor in scientific texts: A Hallidayan perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192
Ko, Bo-Ai. (2010). Two ESL Korean children's narrative writing in relation to genre-based approach. 65(4), 103--129
Lee, S. (2016). Writer identity in narrative and argumentative genres: A case of Korean students in the United States. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(1), 178–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.178
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003
Ma, J., & Stahl, L. (2017). A multimodal critical discourse analysis of anti-vaccination information on Facebook. Library and Information Science Research, 39(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.005
Manar, M. (2016). Wars of media: The transitivity system of fraud-case headlines addressing an Indonesian media-owner politician. The 43rd International Systemic Functional Congress, 117–119.
Martínez, I. A. (2001). Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2
Matu, P. M. (2008). Transitivity as a tool for ideological analysis. Journal of Third World Studies, 25(1), 199–211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45194444
Moore, T. (2007). The “process” of learning : On the use of Halliday’s transitivity in academic skills advising. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 6(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022207072199
Perwitasari, A., Klamer, M., & Schiller, N. O. (2016). Formant frequencies and vowel space area in Javanese and Sundanese English language learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2203-10
Pujiati, T. (2017). The comparison of adjective in Indonesian, Javanese, and Sundanese languages: A syntactic typology analysis. Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v2i2.2244
Purwoko, H. (2013). Fakta sosial: Obyek penelitian linguistik modern. Humanika, 17(1), 191–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.17.1.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42(2), 147-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005612
Sa-ngiamwibool, A. (2014). Recent trends in Asian ESP. The Second International Conference on Education and Language (2nd ICEL), 1–5.
Sari, D. P. (2013). Exposition and recount texts analysis: Schematic structures and linguistics features. Jurnal Ilmiah Esai, 7(3).
Sawaki, Y. (2018). Meneropong tipologi bahasa-bahasa di Papua: Suatu tinjuan singkat. Linguistik Indonesia, 36(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v36i2.79
Schulze, J. (2011). Writing to persuade: A systemic functional view. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 5, 127–157. https://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/600
Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C. E. (2011). Understanding students’ language use about expansion through analyzing their lexicogrammatical resources. Science Education, 95(5), 852–878. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20448
Senjawati, D. (2016). Transitivity analysis of tenth grade students’ recount texts. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 1–22. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/4617
Seo, S. (2013). Hallidayean transitivity analysis: The battle for Tripoli in the contrasting headlines of two national newspapers. Discourse and Society, 24(6), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513503267
Shahab, S., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Ideational grammatical metaphor in pharmaceutical research articles. 3(4), 111–116.
Shokouhi, H., & Amin, F. (2010). A systemist ‘verb transitivity’ analysis of the Persian and English newspaper editorials: A focus of genre familiarity on EFL learner’s reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.4.387-396
Subyantoro. (2019). Linguistik forensik: Sumbangsih kajian bahasa dalam penegakan hukum. Adil Indonesia Jurnal, 1(1), 51–60. http://jurnal.unw.ac.id:1254/index.php/AIJ/article/view/141
Sucipto, A., Mahdi, A., & Sujatna, E. T. (2014). Process types in scientic English clauses: A systemic functional linguistics analysis. 6(4), 389–395.
Wong, M. (2017). Hong Kong English: Exploring lexicogrammar and discourse from a corpus-linguistic perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.academia.edu/31964445/
Xuan, W. (2018). Understanding experiential meaning-making in Chinese adolescent L2 writing: a systemic functional perspective. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0046-2
Yaghoobi, M. (2009). A critical discourse analysis of the selected Iranian and American printed media on the representations of Hizbullah-Israel war. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 21. http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr21/yaghoobi.htm
Zheng, S., Yang, A., & Ge, G. (2014). Functional stylistic analysis: Transitivity in English-medium medical research articles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p12
Zou, H. (2018). On linguistic philosophy of Mikhail Bakhtin and Hallidayan systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 367–371.
Copyright (c) 2022 Marsandi Manar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy by http://ejurnal.budiutomomalang.ac.id/index.php/journey/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.