THE EFFORTS TO INCREASE TEXT RECOUNT WRITING BY USING FLOW SENTENCE TECHNIQUES SEMESTER III OF ABA BALIKPAPAN.
The background of this research is based on the fact that the learning outcomes of the written recount text are still not as expected. Therefore there needs to be an effort from the lecturer to improve the learning outcomes. This research generally aims to improve students' recount text writing skills. Specifically, this research aims for 1) Obtaining information about whether or not the flow sentence technique can improve recount text writing skills, 2) Obtain information about the ability of sentence techniques flow increases student participation in learning to write recount texts. Procedure This Classroom Action Research includes stages: (1) action planning (2) implementation actions, (3) observation and interpretation, and (4) analysis and reflection. This research was designed in two cycles using flow sentence techniques. The research instrument uses test and observation techniques. Data analysis techniques use Descriptive analysis, i.e. student learning outcomes were analyzed by describing inter-test scores cycle with performance indicators. Observation results were analyzed descriptively based on results observation and reflection. The results of this Classroom Action Research are: initial conditions 15 students or 46% are incomplete, 17 students or 54% complete. In cycle I 8 students or 25% are incomplete, 24 students or 75% complete. In Cycle II 4 students or 12.5% did not complete, 28 students or 87.5% complete. The results of the study concluded that the use of the technique flowing sentences can improve students' recount text writing skills third-semester academic year 2019/2020 of ABA Balikpapan. Flowing sentence techniques can also increase student participation in learning to write recount texts. A classical completeness level of 87.5% in the second cycle shows that the learning improvement effort has been successful. The sentence technique is effective used to improve recount text writing skills.
Lie, A. (2002). Mempraktikkan Coopertive Learning di Ruang-Ruang Kelas.
Jakarta : Gramedia.
Arnie F., dkk. (2005). Portofolio dalam pembelajaran IPS. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Fahrudin, A. (2011). Menjadi guru favorite. Jogyakarta : Diva Press
Bachtiar, B., dkk, (2005). Let’s Talk, Pakar Raya. Bandung.
Chaedar, A. (1997). Politik Bahasa dan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Dutton, J. (2019). Writing Paragraphs That Flow. Retrieved from internet at
Hamzah B. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan proses Belajar Mengajar Yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Tarigan, H. (1990). Pengajaran kompetensi Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa
Usman, M. (2011). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Purdy, J. (2009). Creating Flow: Sentences A writing workshop presented by BACTER
(Bringing Advanced Computa&onal Techniques to Energy Research) University of Wisconsin‐Madison. October 2009.
Sabarti, A., dkk. (2001). Menulis I. Buku Materi Pokok. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan
Slameto. (1995). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta : PT
Arikunto, S.,dkk. (2007). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : PT Dumi
Suyatno. (2010). Teknik Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, Surabaya : SIC
Copyright (c) 2020 Journey (Journal of English Language and Pedagogy)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journey (Journal of English Language and Pedagogy) by http://ejurnal.budiutomomalang.ac.id/index.php/journey/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.