Publication Ethics

The Prismatika Journal submit about agreements and ethical standards for all parties involved in all scientific publication processes, such as editors, reviewers, and authors.


Publication Decision

The Prismatika Journal Editor is responsible for making decisions about the manuscript that will be published in the Prismatika Journal. The Editor's Board will guide and direct the Editor through the editorial board's policies and limit certain matters to applicable legal requirements related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors can also discuss with editors or reviewers from other journals to make this decision.

Fair Play

The editor will evaluate submitted texts in accordance with intellectual content without regard to ethnicity, race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the author.


Editors and editorial teams are not permitted to provide any information about the manuscript sent to anyone other than the author, reviewer, prospective reviewer, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Conflict of interest

Material that is not published in the submitted text cannot be used to research the editor himself without the author's direct or written consent.


Contributions to Editorial Decisions

The review process can assist the auditor in making editorial decisions and through communication between the editor and the author will help the author in the process of improving the quality of writing in the text.


Each selected reviewer who feels he is not eligible to review the research reported in the manuscript or the reviewer knows that a quick review is not possible, the reviewer must notify the editor and ask permission from the review process.


Every article received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They cannot be displayed or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor team.

Standard of Objectivity

An objective review must be carried out by the reviewer. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers must express their views clearly with arguments in favor of improving the quality of an article.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers must identify already published relevant works that have not been quoted by other authors. Each statement that observations, derivations, or previously reported arguments must be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer must also draw the attention of the editor if there is a substantial or overlapping similarity between the text being considered and other published papers that have personal knowledge.

Conflict of Interest

The unpublished material contained in the text may not be used for the reviewer's own research without the written permission of the author. Specific information and ideas obtained through the review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal purposes. Reviewers may not consider manuscripts that have a conflict of interest because of a competitive, collaborative or other relationship with one of the authors, or the company involved with the script.


Reporting Standard

Authors of the original research report must present an accurate report of the work performed and objective discussion of its significance. The main data to be represented accurately in the script. The manuscript must contain enough details and references that allow other people to do more research. Statements that are fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors must be very sure that they have written a work that is entirely original from their own thoughts or research, and if the author has used the work and or words of someone else that has been quoted or quoted correctly according to the rules of quotation.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not generally publish the same written text in more than one journal or main publication. Send the same text to more than one journal at the same time because it is an unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Acknowledgment of Sources  

Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author must quote publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported.

Authorship of the Paper

Authors must be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research reported. All who have made significant contributions must be registered as co-authors (contributors). Where there are other people who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research process, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no co-authors are improperly included in the article and that all co-authors have seen and agreed to the final version of the article and have agreed to submit it for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When the author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his self-published article, it is the duty of the author to immediately notify the editor or publisher team and work with the editorial team to recall or correct the article.