The review process in the journal ECODUCATION includes several stages including: Editor receives the manuscript from the author; The editor evaluates the manuscript (purpose and scope of the journal, in the style of the house, additional data); (Denied if it does not meet the criteria) Filter editors for plagiarism in offline and online databases manually; (Rejected if a large plagiarism is found, contact the author if there is a redundancy or a small plagiarism found for clarification) The editor sends the script to the reviewer along with the review form (double blind review, both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous with each other); The reviewer sends the review form back to the Editor (with revised text if necessary); Editor's decision (rejected, requires a major revision, needs a small revision, or is accepted); Confirm to the author. If it is revised, the author revises the text and must be returned to the editor without delay. Returns more than three months will be considered as new shipments.